Respostas
respondido por:
4
Resposta: no she wasn’t
Explicação: pois com “he”, “she” e “it” se usa “wasn’t”. No caso Mary é “she”
luizaarmstrong9:
obrigadaa
respondido por:
2
No, she wasn't.
explicação
O verbo to be in past equivale ao pretérito perfeito e imperfeito de ser/estar.
Com o verbo to be no presente, temos as formas: am, are e is. Mas quando ele está no passado, temos as formas: was e were. Na sua forma negativa, o verbo to be pode ser contraído com NOT:
I was not = I wasn't
He was not = He wasn't
She was not = She wasn't
It was not = It wasn't
You were not = You weren't
We were not = We weren't
They were not = They weren't
Perguntas similares
5 anos atrás
5 anos atrás
7 anos atrás
7 anos atrás
7 anos atrás
8 anos atrás
8 anos atrás